Legal Opinion

In Re Gray's Succession

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 29, 1942No. 36327PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

Three of the descendants of Silas Gray instituted this proceeding under the authority of Articles 927-933, inclusive, of the Revised Civil Code, to have themselves recognized as irregular heirs of the deceased and, as such, to be placed in possession of his estate, to the exclusion of his natural child and other descendants of the deceased’s natural children, against whom the plaintiffs (a grandchild and two great grandchildren) have pleaded the prescription of thirty years under the provisions of Article 1030 of the Revised Civil Code.

The petitioners alleged that Silas Gray…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. United Gas Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Dew v. HammettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. Generes v. Bowie Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  4. Succession of KneippSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  5. Succession of AndersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Succession of MatteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Humphries v. LA. DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS, DIV. OF TRANSP.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Matthews v. CarterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Cameron v. Rowland.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  5. Cameron v. RowlandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API