Legal Opinion

Thompson v. City of Williamsburg

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided April 23, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Willis

Reversing.

Several legal problems respecting street-paving assessments are presented by this record. One is whether the law in force when an ordinance ordering the improvement of a street is passed controls the method and measures the extent of apportioning the assessments against the abutting property to the exclusion of an act taking effect after the improvement is completed, but before the apportionment ordinance is enacted. Another is whether a lot abutting upon an improved street in cities of the fifth class is alone subject to the lien for the cost of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ithaca Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Parsons v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Gosnell v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tuggle v. MarseeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Hargis v. W. T. Congleton Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Garrard v. KinderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. E. J. Knepfle Sons v. City of CliftonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Peters v. City of MoreheadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API