Legal Opinion
Karoumi v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 21, 2019No. 2:18-cv-10379Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ZENA KAROUMI, BASIL Y. 2:18-cv-10379 KAROUMI, Plaintiffs, HON. TERRENCE G. BERG v. ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND ORDER DENYING CROSS- PROPERTY INSURANCE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY COMPANY, JUDGMENT Defendant. Homeowners Zena Karoumi and Basil Y. Karoumi are suing Defendant Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company (“Allstate”) in connection with an insurance coverage dispute. Plaintiffs assert that Allstate breached its obligations under their insurance policy by refusing to cover water damage to their home allegedly caused by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- In Re: Marilyn E. Morris, Debtor. John Poss v. Marilyn E. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.