Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Hycon, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 21, 1965No. Civ. A. 1310-61PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEECH, District Judge.
This action is before the court under Rule 42(b), solely on the issue of whether defendant is “some person other than the employer” within the meaning of Maryland’s Workmen’s Compensation Act, Md.Ann.Code, art. 101, § 58 (1957). The facts were agreed upon by stipulation of the parties.
On May 2, 1958, plaintiff was injured in a collision while operating a truck belonging to defendant Hycon, Inc. At the time, plaintiff was in the employment of Edmonds Art Stone Company, a corporation, and consequent to his accident, applied for and received compensation benefits by order…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Keitz v. National Paving & Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Naranja Rock Co. v. Dawal FarmsSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Bright v. BraggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Sun Cab Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Fisher v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Gurry v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Stratman v. Admiral Beverage Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Leonard v. Sav-A-Stop Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Latham v. Technar, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.