Heintz v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
1DissentGriffin, J.
I dissent. I agree with the majority opinion, if we accept the testimony of plaintiffs in its most favorable light, that there is sufficient evidence shown to establish negligence on the part of defendants in leaving, unattended and unlighted, a box car without warnings parked diagonally across and in the middle of a paved and fairly well traveled street in the nighttime under the circumstances described. The conclusion that defendants were negligent is supported by the decision in the case of Peri v. Los Angeles Junction Ry. Co., 22 Cal.2d 111 [137 P.2d 441], The question of defendants’…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Gray v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Hinds v. WheadonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Whitechat v. GuyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.