United States v. Cecil Richardson, A/K/A Syed Richardson Cecil Richardson
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BARRY, Circuit Judge.
We are called upon to decide an issue which no court of appeals, including our own, has yet discussed, much less decided. Simply stated, the issue before us for decision is whether, when a juvenile adjudication is invoked to enhance a sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act, the sentencing court is required to look only to the fact of conviction and the statutory definition of the prior offense — the “categorical approach” — or whether it may look to the conduct in which the juvenile engaged and make a factual determination that the juvenile…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Shannon Wayne TigheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Anthony J. SmalleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Dale M. Preston, A/K/A Jami Mansour ShabazzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Lester JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- United States v. George Keith Williams, Jr., A/K/A Kevin Richardson United States of America v. George Keith Williams, Jr., A/K/A Kevin RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Almon D. Wells, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Eugene SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Dontey TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.