Legal Opinion

Greenspun v. Lindley

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1975PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

In the circumstances of this case we conclude that holders of beneficial shares of interest in this real estate investment trust who desire to challenge investment decisions of the trustees and the payment by them of what are alleged to be excessive management fees must first make a demand on the trustees before commencing what is the equivalent of a shareholders’ derivative action against the trustees individually.

Mony Mortgage Investors was organized as a business trust under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to carry on business as a "real estate investment trust” as described…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barr v. WackmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Pomerantz v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1951

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. Norlin Corp. v. Rooney, Pace Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. Davis v. Costa-GavrasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  4. Adelphia Communications Corp. v. Bank of America, N.A. (In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  5. Hart v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API