Legal Opinion
Pomerantz v. Clark
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 30, 1951No. Civ. A. 50-615, 50-624, 50-929, 51-67, 51-74, 51-79, 51-98, 51-132, 51-185, 51-260, 51-261, 51-415PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYZANSKI, District Judge.
Motions to dismiss complaints for failure to 'State a cause of action have been filed by all defendants in twelve companion cases. These cases involve similar charges brought by minority policyholders against directors of two insurance companies and other persons alleged to have participated in corporate loans said to have been improper and unlawful. The reasons why these motions must be granted can be most conveniently stated by selecting for this-opinion the typical motion filed by Sidney W. Winslow, Jr., one of the defendants in Civil Action No. 50-625, Pomerantz…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- In Re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions. Joseph B. KauffmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- Harhen v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Hausman v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Elgin v. Alfa Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- S. Harold Levitt v. Edward C. Johnson, 2dCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.