Legal Opinion

St. John v. North Carolina Parole Commission

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1991No. C-C-90-286-PPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

ROBERT D. POTTER, District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Respondents' motions, filed October 22, 1990, for summary judgment. The motions are in response to a petition filed by Petitioners on August 31, 1990 in which Petitioners St. John and Peterson seek relief from incarceration under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and Petitioner Cinema Blue seeks relief from paying a fine under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On March 4, 1991, Respondents filed amended motions for summary judgment. Petitioners, on March 7, 1991 and March 19, 1991, filed responses to the motions for summary…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API