Legal Opinion

Bauer v. Fitzhugh

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided October 19, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01293Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MARY ANN BAUER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) NO. 3:18-cv-01293 v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) MICHAEL S. FITZHUGH, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. No. 50, “Motion”). Plaintiff filed a Response opposing the Motion (Doc. No. 53). Defendants replied, (Doc. No. 55), and the Motion is ripe for review. For the reasons stated herein, the Motion will be GRANTED. Additionally, Defendant Fitzhugh will be dismissed from this…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Vivian J. Scheid v. Fanny Farmer Candy Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  4. Fritz v. Charter Township of Com-StockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Commercial Money Center, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API