Legal Opinion

Claibourne v. Willis

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 13, 1997No. 116, Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Judge.

This appeal arises from a most unusual set of circumstances. The appellant, Desirea Claibourne (Claibourne), and the appellee, Richard A. Willis (Willis), were involved in an automobile accident, which occurred at the intersection of Erdman and Mannesota Avenues in Baltimore City and in which Claibourne was injured. When the accident occurred, Claibourne was insured by the Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund (MAIF) and, as was determined subsequently, Willis was uninsured. Claibourne retained counsel, Harvey A. Kirk (Kirk) of Saiontz & Kirk, P.A., to represent her in connection…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Tandra S. v. Tyrone W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Newman v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Inlet Associates v. Harrison Inn Inlet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Beyond Systems, Inc. v. Realtime Gaming Holding Co., LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Jones v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Moore v. MileyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Taha v. Southern Management CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Hiob v. Progressive American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API