Legal Opinion

Inlet Associates v. Harrison Inn Inlet, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 11, 1991No. 151, September Term, 1990PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

We granted certiorari in the instant case to determine what standard of appellate review should be applied when a trial court has imposed sanctions in the form of costs and attorney’s fees pursuant to Maryland Rule 1-341. The facts giving rise to this controversy cannot be stated as simply and succinctly as the issue before the Court.

This appeal arises out of a $22,000,000 lawsuit filed by Inlet Associates (Inlet) against Harrison Inn Inlet, Inc., Harrison Inn Sixty-Six, Inc., Hale Harrison, John Harrison (the Harrisons), and their attorney, K. King Burnett, for abuse of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Turner v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Printers II, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Major v. First Virginia Bank-Central MarylandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Blitz v. Beth Isaac Adas Israel CongregationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Christian v. Maternal-Fetal Med. Assoc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. Deleon Enterprises, Inc. v. ZainoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API