Legal Opinion

DiTata v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 2, 1988No. 86-282-AppealPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FAY, Chief Justice.

This civil action comes before us on the plaintiffs’ appeal from a grant of summary judgment issued in Superior Court on the basis of an agreed statement of facts. A trial justice in the Sixth Division District Court had previously granted a similar motion in response to the plaintiffs’ initial complaint.

The parties have stipulated to the facts from which this insurance dispute arises. The plaintiffs, Nickolas and Gloria DiTata (the DiTatas), purchased a personal automobile-insurance policy from defendant, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aet-na). The policy period…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pickering v. American Employers InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  2. Bibeault v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  3. Aldcroft v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  4. Allstate Insurance Company v. FuscoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1966
  5. Poulos v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Amica Mutual Insurance v. StreickerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  2. Ellis v. Rhode Island Public Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
  3. Gerald R. Carlton, Etc. v. Worcester Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. FlynnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  5. Bartlett v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API