Legal Opinion
Schubert v. Ivey
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 22, 1969PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.
Indian Harbor Properties, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Indian, was a corporation which owned and operated a motel and restaurant in Greenwich. Indian was owned by seven persons, each of whom held an identical one-seventh interest, consisting of a $30,000 note of Indian and 300 shares of stock having a par value of $100. Each of the three defendants, Curtis L. Ivey, Louis C. Huck, Jr., and Victor Muscat, and the plaintiff, Robert W. Schubert, owned such a one-seventh interest. The three owners of the other one-seventh interests are not mentioned in the finding and are not involved in this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sturtevant v. SturtevantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Ives v. City of WillimanticSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Woodruff v. PerrottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Security Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
- Massaro v. Savoy Estates Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fraser v. HenningerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C. v. BeckettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Mongillo v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Anderson v. Pension & Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Walker v. People's United BankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.