Legal Opinion

Spurger v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 6, 2018No. A160697PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

*228In this workers' compensation case, claimant challenges the Workers' Compensation Board's determination that she is not entitled to an award of five percent impairment for a chronic and permanent medical condition, as defined in OAR 436-035-0019(1)(i). This is the second time that we have considered a board order rejecting claimant's request for an award for chronic condition impairment. See Spurger v. SAIF , 266 Or. App. 183, 337 P.3d 883 (2014). We conclude that the board's order is not supported by substantial reason, and we therefore reverse and remand the order.

Claimant works for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Godinez v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Spurger v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Broeke v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API