Legal Opinion

Paskowitz v. Prospect Capital Management LP.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 24, 2017No. 16 Civ. 2990 (LLS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

LOUIS L. STANTON, United States District Judge.

Plaintiff Susan Paskowitz seeks pursuant to Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“ICA”), 15 U.S.C. § 80a-35(b), to recover what she claims are excessive fees paid by Prospect Capital Corporation (“Prospect”) to defendants Prospect Capital Management L.P. (“PCM”) and Prospect Administration LLC (“PA”) for investment advisory and administrative services. Defendants move to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion is granted.

BACKG…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Littlejohn v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  2. General Motors Corp. v. TracySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Wilson v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Blackrock Mut. Funds Advisory Fee Litig.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
  2. Pirundini v. J.P. Morgan Inv. Mgmt. Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Nancy Goodman v. J.P. Morgan Investment Mgmt.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API