Legal Opinion

Worthen v. Shurtleff and Andrews, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1967No. 10651Published

1Opinion of the Court

19 Utah 2d 80 (1967)

426 P.2d 223

BRUCE T. WORTHEN, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT,

v.

SHURTLEFF AND ANDREWS, INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT, AND

THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, SUCCESSOR OF THE COMMISSION OF FINANCE, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE STATE INSURANCE FUND, INTERVENOR AND APPELLANT.

No. 10651.

Supreme Court of Utah.

April 3, 1967.

Robert D. Moore, Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Edward M. Garrett, Salt Lake City, for respondent.

CROCKETT, Chief Justice:

This is an appeal by The State Insurance Fund from an order requiring it to pay its proportionate share of costs and attorney's fees incurred by plaintiff, Bruce…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norville v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Charles Seligman Distributing Company v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  3. Rogalski v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Worthen v. Shurtleff and Andrews, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. McConnell v. Commission of FinanceUtah Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API