K-Mar Industries, Inc. v. United States Department of Defense
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEPHEN P. FRIOT, District Judge.
This order addresses defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P. (Doc. no. 23.)
Plaintiff is K-Mar Industries, Inc. Defendants are the United States Department of Defense and the United States Department of the Army. The complaint alleges that plaintiff provides Training Support Center services and operates a Multimedia/Visual Information Service Center at Fort Still, Oklahoma. The complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under 5 U.S.C. § 706(2) of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA),…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- American Fed. of Govt. Employees v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- International Genomics Consortium v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Hallmark-Phoenix 3, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Fisher-Cal Industries, Inc. v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012