Legal Opinion
Fisher-Cal Industries, Inc. v. United States of America
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 19, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-0791PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
On July 30, 2011, the U.S. Air Force determined that it would not renew plaintiff Fisher-Cal Industries’ contract to perform certain multimedia services at Dover Air Force Base, instead choosing to “convert to in-house” the services performed by the plaintiff “based upon anticipated savings.” Defs.’ Mot. Dismiss, ECF No. 6, Ex. 1. Following the expiration of the plaintiffs contract, the plaintiff initiated the instant lawsuit against the United States, the U.S. Department of Defense, and the U.S. Air Force, alleging that the defendants’…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- 360Training.com, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Fisher-Cal Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Vfa, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Combat Medical, LLC v. EsperDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
- Strategi Consulting, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026