Legal Opinion

Hattner v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 6, 1923No. 3802PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff in error was prosecuted by information containing three counts, under the National Prohibition. Act (41 Stat. 305) — the first and second charging, respectively, unlawful possession and unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor at Toledo, Ohio, without statement of specific location; the third count charging the maintaining as a common nuisance of “a pl'ace at No. 2057 North Fourteenth street” in Toledo, Ohio, “where intoxicating liquor was kept and manufactured in violation of Title 2 of the National Prohibition Act.”

*382On the trial, upon its appearing by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
  3. Lucas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  4. Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. MehraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Addis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  3. People v. HollandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Todd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  5. Heitman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API