Lucas v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
la Error to the District Court oí the United Slates for the District of Colorado; Robert K. Lewis, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against Roy Lucas and jack Hicks. Judgment of conviction, aad defendants bring error,
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Circuit judge.
Separate writs of error by Roy Lucas and by Jack Hicks from conviction for conspiracy to violate the Reed Amendment (39 Stat. 1069 [Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Qupp. 1919, §§ 8739a, 10387a-10387c]). Lucas and Hicks were jointly indicted in four separate cases, which were consolidated for trial. The conviction was under one of the indictments charging conspiracy at *406Cheyenne, Wyo., to transport intoxicants from that place to Denver, Colo. The points here urged are: Lack of jurisdiction; wrongful consolidation of the four cases for trial; insufficiency of the evidence;…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1920
- Block v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
3Cited by25 opinions
- Anthony Cardarella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Bratcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- United States v. Samuel Dunkel & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- United States v. James J. D'AntonioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Eddie B. Kleven and Maynard W. Maetzold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.