Legal Opinion

Millross v. Plum Hollow Golf Club

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1987No. 77710, (Calendar No. 16)Published

1Opinion of the Court

429 Mich. 178 (1987)

413 N.W.2d 17

MILLROSS

v.

PLUM HOLLOW GOLF CLUB

Docket No. 77710, (Calendar No. 16).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued November 13, 1986.

Decided October 6, 1987.

Sachs, Nunn, Kates, Kadushin, O'Hare, Helveston & Waldman, P.C. (by Kathleen L. Bogas), for the plaintiffs.

Kohl, Secrest, Wardle, Lynch, Clark & Hampton (by Roger F. Wardle and Timothy F. Casey) for the defendant.

BOYLE, J.

The issue presented by this case is whether the exclusive remedy of the dramshop act bars plaintiff's claim against defendant for the negligent supervision of an employee. We hold that plaintiff's…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Browder v. International Fidelity InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Smith v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Dickinson v. EdwardsWashington Supreme Court · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API