Legal Opinion
American Bank Trust Co. v. Feeney Tool Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 6, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The essential facts, found by the trial court, are as follows: On August 4th,' 1920, the plaintiff loaned $10,000 to The Feeney Tool Company, Inc., and the company gave the plaintiff its demand note secured by a third mortgage on its real estate. On December 3d, 1921, the plaintiff loaned the Tool Company the further sum of $3,000, upon an unsecured note due March 10th, 1922. On April 3d, 1922, Karl Auth, owner of the second mortgage on the real estate, brought an action of foreclosure. On April 6th, 1922, the Tool Company executed to the plaintiff, as additional security for the notes of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Horn v. Pere Marquette R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1907
- New Haven Wire Co. CasesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
- Richards v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- City National Bank v. StoeckelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- American Clay MacHinery Co. v. New England Brick Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Strother v. McCordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Kerby v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- More v. Western Connecticut Title & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Frye, Recr. v. MacWilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
- Nick v. HoltzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.