Legal Opinion

Torrence v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 10, 2026No. 24-258Published

1Opinion of the Court

5IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ______________________________________ ) JENNER TORRENCE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 24-258 ) v. ) Filed: August 10, 2026 ) THE UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________________ ) OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Jenner Torrence alleges that the District of Columbia Air National Guard (“D.C. ANG”) improperly curtailed his tour as an Active Guard and Reserve (“AGR”) Officer, which deprived him of active duty pay and other benefits he would have received but for his curtailment. The D.C. ANG curtailed Plaintiff’s tour after Plaintiff…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  5. Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API