Legal Opinion

People v. Valdez

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1995No. B087129PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRIGNON, J.

Defendant and appellant Alberto Valdez 1 appeals from a judgment of conviction following a certified guilty plea in municipal court to the sale of cocaine and an admission of a prior narcotics-related conviction. Defendant contends the superior court acted in excess of its jurisdiction when it denied his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, instead of remanding the matter to the municipal court for a hearing on the motion, as required by Penal Code section 859a. 2 We conclude the provisions of section 859a, concerning motions to withdraw guilty pleas, are mandatory, but not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Sommer v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Markosyan v. Superior Court CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. People v. HernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API