Legal Opinion
Bryan v. Raynor
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided June 6, 1989No. 8810SC1059PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Petitioners contend that all interested persons are entitled to a fair opportunity to be heard in quasi-judicial proceedings, and their right to be heard was denied when Dr. Raynor attended the meeting of the Aldermen without notice to petitioners.
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 160A-381 any city may regulate the areas within its jurisdiction through zoning ordinances.
The [zoning] regulations may . . . provide that the board of adjustment or the city council may issue special use permits or conditional use permits in the classes of cases or situations and in accordance with the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Piney Mountain Neighborhood Ass'n v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Burton v. New Hanover County Zoning Board of Adjustment Under the Zoning OrdinanceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Pigford v. BOARD OF ADJ. OF CITY OF KINSTONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cook v. Union Zoning Bd. of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Cook v. UNION ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENTCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Ward v. InscoeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Berger v. New Hanover Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rsNorth Carolina Business Court · 2013
- Hall v. Henderson Cnty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026