Legal Opinion

Quality Ford, Inc. v. Faust

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 9, 1991No. 91-214PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

Appellant and separate defendant below, Quality Ford, appeals a default judgment entered by the Pulaski County Circuit Court contending the judgment should not have been entered because the answer filed by separate defendant Ford Motor Company inured to appellant’s benefit and because appellant was prohibited from presenting evidence concerning mitigation of damages. We do not reach the merits of this case because the order appealed from does not comply with the requirements of ARCP Rule 54(b) and is therefore not a final and appealable order. We must dismiss the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilburn v. Keenan Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. McIlroy Bank & Trust v. ZuberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Middleton v. StilwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Black v. CrawleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Elardo v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bayird v. FloydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Smith v. LeonardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Budget Tire & Supply Co. v. First National Bank of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Bess v. HerrinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API