Legal Opinion

Bess v. Herrin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 8, 1992No. 91-244Published

1Opinion

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON DENIAL OF REHEARING

Shaw, Ledbetter, Hornberger, Cogbill & Arnold, by: Robert E. Hornberger, for appellant. Mark S. Cambiano, for appellee. Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

Appellee petitions for rehearing of this case. In her petition, appellee relies on the concept of inferred negligence and the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. Because we made no errors of law or fact in deciding this case, we deny appellee’s request for rehearing. However, because of appellee’s reliance on the doctrine of res ipsa, it occurred to us that our opinion in this case was in need of clarification…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stalter v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Lytle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. FishSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  4. Quality Ford, Inc. v. FaustSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Bess v. HerrinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API