Legal Opinion
Reingold v. Swiftships Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 14, 2000No. 99-30031PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENNIS, Circuit Judge:
This is an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) by Reingold from the district court’s in limine order excluding Reingold’s evidence of profits that Swift-ships allegedly derived from the alleged misappropriation of a Reingold trade secret. See Reingold, v. Swiftships, Inc., 126 F.3d 645 (5th Cir.1997) for more of the gist of this case.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
This court reviews questions of law de novo. See Hassan v. Lubbock Indep. Sch. Dist., 55 F.3d 1075, 1079 (5th Cir.1995) (citing Moore v. Eli Lilly & Co., 990 F.2d 812, 815 (5th Cir.) (citations omitted), cert.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Yamaha Motor Corp., USA v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Minyard v. Curtis Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
- Grimes v. Ohio Edison CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Irving Reingold v. Swiftships, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Hassan Ex Rel. Hassan v. Lubbock Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re K-Dur Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Auto Channel, Inc. v. Speed Vision Network, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2001
- Jesus Lopez v. Ramon VaqueraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- United States Marine, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. v. ABS Capital Partners, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.