Auto Channel, Inc. v. Speed Vision Network, LLC
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HEYBURN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Auto Channel, Inc., Robert Gordon, and Marco Rauch, developed a concept for a new cable television channel, The Auto Channel (or TACH), designed to capture the American male’s interest in moving vehicles. They sought investment and, just as important, access to cable broadcasting systems. The current lawsuit distills down to three basic complaints: Defendants Comcast Corporation (“Com-cast”) and Cox Communications, Inc. (“Cox”) unlawfully appropriated Plaintiffs’ trade secrets, violated contractual agreements, and delayed the Auto…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Howlett v. Birkdale Shipping Co., S.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Composite Marine Propellers, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Gerbrig Van Der Woude, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Edward Abney, Barbara Allen, James Day, Robert Green, Delbert Jackson, James Pugh, Roger L. Thacker, and Daniel Hunter Webster v. Amgen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Mortgage Specialists, Inc. v. DaveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Hauck Manufacturing Co. v. Astec Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2004
- Accuimage Diagnostics Corp. v. Terarecon, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Davis v. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2005
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.