Legal Opinion

State v. Maloney

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 18, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAUFLEY, Justice.

[¶ 1] The issue presented here is whether, in opposing a defendant’s motion to suppress, the State has the burden of proving the identity of the defendant. We conclude that it does not, and therefore vacate the decision of the District Court (Portland, Gor-anites, J.) granting a motion to suppress on the sole ground that the State failed at the suppression hearing to identify the defendant as the person arrested.

[¶ 2] On December 1, 1996, Officer Matthew Barrett of the South Portland Police Department observed a vehicle operating the wrong way on a one-way street in South…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Jose M. Cruz JimenezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Robert DallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
  5. State v. ParkinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Paul LovettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  2. State of Maine v. Michael J. Warner IISupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  3. State v. FilionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  4. People v. JorlantinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  5. State of Maine v. Kevin M. O'DonnellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API