Hardy v. Integon Life Insurance Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Defendant assigns error to the court’s submission to the jury of the issue of materiality. We agree in principle.
It is settled in this State that an insurer may avoid his obligations under an insurance contract by showing that the insured made false representations in his application and that the misrepresentations were material. Tolbert v. Insurance Co., 236 N.C. 416, 72 S.E. 2d 915 (1952); Pittman v. First Protection Life Ins. Co., 72 N.C. App. 428, 325 S.E. 2d 287, cert. denied, 313 N.C. 509, 329 S.E. 2d 393 (1985). However, misrepresentations in the form of written answers to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sims ex rel. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Tolbert v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Gouldin Ex Rel. Wiley v. Inter-Ocean InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Thomas-Yelverton Co. v. State Capital Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cullen v. Valley Forge Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Tharrington v. Sturdivant Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994