State v. Kelso
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MANFORD, Judge.
This is a direct appeal from a jury conviction for arson first degree. The jury affixed punishment at 15 years. The judgment is affirmed.
Appellant presents one point of error on appeal, charging that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal because the evidence was insufficient, as a matter of law, to sustain a conviction of arson first degree because it was not proven that there was damage to an inhabitable structure within the meaning and requirements of § 569.040, RSMo 1978. Since appellant attacks the sufficiency of the evidence, detailed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. FrancoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- State v. BiddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- State v. NewmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- State v. PisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. OxendineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- In the Interest of: T.L.G. v. Juvenile OfficerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Kelso v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. SimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984