State v. Pisano
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.
The accused, having elected trial by the court without a jury, has been found guilty of the crime of arson and has appealed. He asks to have a number of the paragraphs of the finding stricken out, but they are all supported by credible evidence and must stand. He also asks to have added to the finding many additional facts which he had included in his request for a finding. A number of these are not admitted or undisputed and cannot be added; but others should have been found because they were either admitted or undisputed; they were evidently omitted because the trial court considered them…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kurtz v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- State v. RathbunSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- People v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Graham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. FamigliettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. GuilfoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- State v. AnnunziatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. JoyceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Hoffman Wall Paper Co. v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.