Legal Opinion
City of Santa Clara v. Andrus
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 1, 1978No. Nos. 77-1110, 77-1270, 77-1189 and 76-3670PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
This case concerns sales by the Secretary of the Interior of low-cost hydroelectric power generated by the Central Valley Project in California. The city of Santa Clara filed this action for declaratory and injunctive relief, challenging the Secretary’s decisions to withdraw power from the City and to deny it an allocation of “firm” (non-withdrawable) power. The Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) was allowed to intervene and counterclaim for certain funds being held in an escrow. All parties moved for summary judgment. The district court granted the Secretary’s…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Jack Allen v. City of Beverly HillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Barrington Cove Ltd. Partnership v. Rhode Island Housing & Mortgage Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Fidelity Financial Corporation v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, Milton Feinerman, President of the Federal Home Loan Bank of S.F.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Rank v. NimmoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Helen Armstrong v. Terry ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.