Legal Opinion

Dillard v. Dillard

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 30, 1903PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Certiorari. Before Judge Russell. Rabun superior court. August 28, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtLamab, J.

1. Where by mutual agreement a note was given by J. to A., the latter having accepted the former as a substitute for his original debtor, W., this was a novation, and the debt from W. to A. was abrogated. Ferst v. Bank, 111 Ga. 232.

2. The fact that it subsequently appeared that the note was for an amount greater than W’s indebtedness to A. would certainly not wholly defeat a recovery thereon.

3. Where there had been a novation and substitution as above set forth, an ex-ecutory agreement by A. to surrender this note and take another from J. for *98the correct amount, with a provision, that it was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ferst's Sons & Co. v. Bank of WaycrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Drum Standish Commission Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Nalley Land & Investment Co. v. Merchants & Planters BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Acree v. KaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Ambrister v. DaltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Farmers State Bank v. SingletaryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API