Legal Opinion
Arenz v. Bronston
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided January 21, 1999No. 98-1357PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDykman, P.J.
Carole Arenz appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Leo J. Bronston, D.C., William M. Sterba, D.C., Bronston Orthopedic-Chiropractic Clinics and ABC Insurance Company (hereinafter "Bronston and Sterba"), and from a judgment dismissing her complaint. The issue in this case is whether Arenz's claim against her chiropractors is governed by the medical malpractice statute of limitations set out under § 893.55, STATS., 1 or the general personal injury statute of limitations set out under § 893.54, STATS. 2 Section 893.54 allows a claimant to file suit within three years of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. LossmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Germanotta v. National Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Hannemann v. BoysonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Webb v. Ocularra Holding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- Hannemann v. BoysonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Canfield v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.