Webb v. Ocularra Holding, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCubley, J.
¶ 1. Roger Webb appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Ocularra Holding, Inc., d/b/a Pearle Vision Express (Pearle Vision). Webb argues that the trial court erred when it determined that the medical malpractice statute of limitations applied to his action seeking damages from a Pearle Vision optometrist who, he claimed, failed to note an abnormal test result from Webb's eye examination and to refer Webb to a medical specialist. Webb also contends that the trial court erred in determining that the medical malpractice statute of limitations had expired before he brought his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Spitler v. DeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- In Matter of Estate of BilsieCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Clark v. ErdmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Paul v. SkempWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Estate of Hegarty Ex Rel. Hegarty v. BeauchaineCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Estate of Hegarty Ex Rel. Hegarty v. BeauchaineCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- McCullough v. LINDBLADEDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.