Legal Opinion

Webb v. Ocularra Holding, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 28, 1999No. 99-0979-FTPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCubley, J.

¶ 1. Roger Webb appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Ocularra Holding, Inc., d/b/a Pearle Vision Express (Pearle Vision). Webb argues that the trial court erred when it determined that the medical malpractice statute of limitations applied to his action seeking damages from a Pearle Vision optometrist who, he claimed, failed to note an abnormal test result from Webb's eye examination and to refer Webb to a medical specialist. Webb also contends that the trial court erred in determining that the medical malpractice statute of limitations had expired before he brought his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gross v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Spitler v. DeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Matter of Estate of BilsieCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  5. Clark v. ErdmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Paul v. SkempWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Phelps v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Estate of Hegarty Ex Rel. Hegarty v. BeauchaineCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  4. Estate of Hegarty Ex Rel. Hegarty v. BeauchaineCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  5. McCullough v. LINDBLADEDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API