Legal Opinion
Dilg v. Bank of United States
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 12, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlennon, J.
This is a submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts.
The following questions are presented by the stipulation:
“ 1. Under Section 114 of the Banking Law and Section 374 of the General Business Law, is the defendant Bank liable to the plaintiff herein for knowingly taking, receiving or reserving from *224the Amcarmta Holding Corporation, or charging the said corporation upon the said note a rate of interest greater than 6% per annum? “ 2. If so, is the plaintiff entitled to recover:- “ (a) Twice the amount of all the interest taken on the note, to wit, twice $798.61, or
“ (b)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rosa v. . ButterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Butterworth v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Southern Life Insurance and Tr. Co. v. . Packer PrenticeNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Butterworth v. O'BrienNew York Supreme Court · 1858
- Bank of America v. P. J. Tierney Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rosen v. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Tides Edge Corp. v. Central Federal SavingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Central Trust Co. v. Simmons Motor Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Delta Brands International Corp. v. Banco de la Nacion Argentina, New York BranchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986