Legal Opinion
Rosen v. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'n
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William R. Brennan, Jr., J.
Both sides move for summary judgment in this action brought to recover $51,000 under the provisions of section 380-e of the Banking Law. That is a recent addition made by chapter 963 of the Laws of 1960, effective April 28,1960. It is entitled “ Effect of usury ” and reads in part: ‘1 The knowingly taking, receiving, reserving, or charging by a savings and loan association of interest at a rate greater than six per centum per annum, or in excess of such greater rate of interest as may be authorized by law, shall be held and adjudged a forfeiture of the entire…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- General Phoenix Corp. v. CabotNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Jenkins v. MoyseNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Salvin v. . Myles Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Union Dime Savings Institution v. WilmotNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Pink v. L. Kaplan, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Meadow Brook National Bank v. RecileDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
- Wiltsek v. Anglo-American Properties, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Bethke v. Idaho Sav. & Loan AssociationIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Bethke v. Idaho Sav. & Loan AssociationIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Soparge v. RosenblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971