Legal Opinion

Bill Gray Enterprises, Inc. Employee Health & Welfare Plan Ex Rel. Bill Gray Enterprises, Inc. v. Gourley

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 26, 2001No. 00-3412, 00-1400UnknownCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.

The principal issue on appeal is whether a self-funded employee benefit plan which purchases stop-loss insurance from a third party insurance provider is subject to Pennsylvania laws governing the enforcement of anti-subrogation clauses in insurance contracts. We join our sister circuits in holding a self-funded employee benefit plan with stop-loss insurance is not deemed an insurance provider under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Therefore, the plan is not subject to state laws regulating insurance contracts.

I

A

Bill Gray Enterprises,…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bill Gray Enterprises, Incorporated Employee Health And Welfare Plan v. Ronald L. GourleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Sissoko v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API