City of Long Beach v. Standard Oil Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TANNER, District Judge:
The City of Long Beach and the State of California (plaintiffs) appeal from a jury verdict against them and in favor of Exxon. They take issue with four jury instructions given by the trial court and with evidentiary rulings made during the trial. Because we find that the claimed error, if any, in the formulation of the jury instructions was harmless, and because we find that the district court did not err in refusing to admit plaintiffs’ proffered evidence, we uphold the jury’s verdict in favor of Exxon and AFFIRM. Exxon cross-appeals the district court’s denial of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc., and Mission Gas Oil Company, Inc. And Petroleum Products Co. v. Texaco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Western Air Lines, Inc. v. CriswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Pierce v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Maximo HILAO, Class Plaintiffs, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ESTATE OF Ferdinand MARCOS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Dewayne Bearchild v. Kristy CobbanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Amarel v. ConnellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Sheet Metal Workers' International Association Local Union No. 359 v. Madison Industries, Inc., of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.