Legal Opinion

Exsted v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 5, 1985No. C7-85-869PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Appellant’s driving privileges were revoked for refusing to take a breath test, and he petitioned for judicial review. The trial court sustained the revocation. We reverse.

FACTS

Appellant Collin Exsted was arrested for driving while intoxicated on January 6, 1985. He was read the implied consent advisory and agreed to submit to the breath test.

Officer Steven Cobb, a certified Intoxi-lyzer operator, attempted to administer a breath test to appellant. Appellant’s first breath sample was deficient and registered an alcohol concentration reading of .185 as the highest…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State, Department of Highways v. BeckeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Palbicki v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Noren v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Gunderson v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Swedzinski v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frost v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Fisher v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Benolkin v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API