Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1986No. C4-86-547PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Appellant James Fisher’s driving privileges were revoked for refusing testing under the implied consent law. He petitioned for judicial review and, after a hearing, the trial court sustained the revocation. He appeals from the trial court’s order. We affirm.

FACTS

Following an accident in which he was driving, James Rodney Fisher was transported to Clearwater County Hospital where he agreed to take a blood test.

Clarice Sunderland, a registered nurse for 29 years, trained and experienced in taking blood samples, put the syringe into Fisher’s arm and pushed the plunger in. She…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Connolly v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Sigfrinius v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Exsted v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haase v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Donnelly v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API