Lancaster v. Fitzhugh
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Donald L. Corbin, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the Sebastian Circuit Court finding that appellee, attorney John Fitzhugh, is entitled to 20% of any recovery by appellants, his former clients Frances and Larry Lancaster, in the setting aside of a trust. On appeal, appellants assert the circuit court erred in entering such an order because it was without subject matter jurisdiction to do so and because it awarded damages not contemplated by the parties. Appellants’ first argument concerning subject matter jurisdiction requires our construction of Ark. Code Ann. § 16-22-304(d)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Walt Bennett Ford, Inc. v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Springdale School District v. JamesonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Henry, Walden & Davis v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- UHS of Arkansas, Inc. v. Charter Hospital of Little Rock, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Lockley v. EasleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Salmon v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Salmon v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003