Legal Opinion

Salmon v. Atkinson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 11, 2003No. 03-535Published

1Opinion of the Court

137 S.W.3d 383 (2003)

Joy SALMON

v.

Virginia ATKINSON and James Howell.

No. 03-535.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

December 11, 2003.

Wright, Lindsey & Jennings LLP, by: Alston Jennings, Little Rock, for appellant.

James R. Howell, North Little Rock, pro se.

DONALD L. CORBIN, Justice.

This case involves an issue of first impression: Whether an attorney who enters into a contingent-fee contract with a client and is later discharged by the client may bring an action for a quantum-meruit fee prior to the resolution of the former client's lawsuit. Appellant Joy Salmon contends that the discharged attorney's…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Rosenberg v. LevinSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. Matter of TillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Plaza Shoe Store, Inc. v. Hermel, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API