Salmon v. Atkinson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
137 S.W.3d 383 (2003)
Joy SALMON
v.
Virginia ATKINSON and James Howell.
No. 03-535.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
December 11, 2003.
Wright, Lindsey & Jennings LLP, by: Alston Jennings, Little Rock, for appellant.
James R. Howell, North Little Rock, pro se.
DONALD L. CORBIN, Justice.
This case involves an issue of first impression: Whether an attorney who enters into a contingent-fee contract with a client and is later discharged by the client may bring an action for a quantum-meruit fee prior to the resolution of the former client's lawsuit. Appellant Joy Salmon contends that the discharged attorney's…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Rosenberg v. LevinSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Matter of TillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Plaza Shoe Store, Inc. v. Hermel, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.