United States v. Koyomejian
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the question whether federal law enforcement officers may legally subject individuals to video surveillance as part of a domestic criminal investigation, and if so what standards govern such surveillance. We join the four other circuits that have faced this question and found that, properly conducted, video surveillance in domestic criminal investigations is lawful, although we base our conclusion on somewhat different grounds.1 We hold further that the procedural requirements of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986, 18 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Forest Conservation Council v. Rosboro Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- In re Assets of MartinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- American Tunaboat Ass'n v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. ChenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. NicholsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.