Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
Petitioner applies for a writ of mandate for the purpose of compelling respondent to allow petitioner to amend a document theretofore served and filed by petitioner as a draft of a bill of exceptions. The question as to whether or not the peremptory writ should be granted is raised by respondent’s demurrer to the petition.
The following facts appear from the allegations of the petition: On April 1, 1916, Pearl Meeker and William McGuire commenced an action against petitioner and Samuel Bowen in the Superior Court in and for the county of Fresno for the conversion of certain drilling machinery…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Estate of RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Bedan v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- White v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Moore v. Judge of Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Derr v. BusickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dainty Pretzel Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Nichols v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938