Legal Opinion

Clinton Natl. Bank v. Saucier

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 1, 1998No. 97-633PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Chief Justice.

The question here is whether Iowa Code section 535.17 (1995) prevents enforcement of an alleged oral agreement between a bank and a customer to honor overdrafts drawn on the customer’s checking account. The district court held that it did. Accordingly, the court granted the bank’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the customer’s counterclaim against the bank for breach of the alleged agreement. We affirm.

I. Background facts and proceedings.

The present dispute began when plaintiff Clinton National Bank (Bank) filed a petition at law in district court, naming…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Phipps v. IASD Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  3. Gabrilson v. FlynnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. Schaller v. Marine National Bank of NeenahCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  5. Cox v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Darla Legg and Jason T. Legg, on Behalf of Themselves and All Persons Similarly Situated v. West BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. Joseph Sarachek v. Luana Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. Beal Bank v. SiemsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  4. Larry Muff v. Wells Fargo Bank NACourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  5. Sarachek v. Luana Savings Bank (In re Agriprocessors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API