Legal Opinion
Andrew v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided November 12, 1935No. 42999PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
The facts on which the decision in this case must rest are not in controversy. They appear either by stipulation or documentary evidence.
The Fuller Company on October 20, 1932, instituted an action at law against S. A. Iiealy to recover the purchase price of merchandise sold and asked judgment for $9,039.49 and interest. The petition alleged that S. A. Healy was a nonresident of the state of Iowa and prayed for writ of attachment. The writ was issued and notice of garnishment served upon the Union Savings Bank & Trust Company of Davenport. J. R. Lewis, a representative of the firm of Lane &…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Officer v. OfficerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Dolph v. CrossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Smith v. Sanborn State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Whitcomb v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Leach v. Iowa State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Carpenter v. Suffolk Franklin Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Van Wie v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1948
- Jensen v. State Bank of AllisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Jerry Harmon Motors, Inc. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.